Who murdered Borys Derevyanko?
      August 11, 1997
      As the conclusion of your 23Oct94 60 Minutes story, The Ugly Face of Freedom, was that
      Ukraine is a place in which Ukrainians practice violence against Jews, it is highly
      relevant that Borys Derevyanko is Ukrainian and Eduard Hurvits is Jewish. You went to
      Ukraine looking for evidence of Ukrainians harming Jews, you failed to find such
      evidence, but you broadcast your conclusion anyway. The true story that you would not
      broadcast, and that was readily documentable, is that Ukraine is a place in which Jews
      harm Ukrainians. The plainest moral to be drawn from the Derevyanko-Hurvits story is
      that when a muckraking Ukrainian editor takes on a corrupt Jewish politician, the
      Ukrainian editor ends up dead. That is the reality of Ukraine. It was the reality of
      Ukraine when you visited it in 1994, it was the reality of Ukraine before 1994, and it
      has been the reality of Ukraine since 1994.
      As in earlier letters, I fault you for not reporting such incidents as are in the above
      table that took place before 1994, and I fault you for precipitating such incidents that
      took place after 1994. Thus, to the blood that is already on your hands, I add the
      blood of Borys Derevyanko. You had the opportunity in your 1994 broadcast to come out
      on the side of the victims against the butchers, but you preferred to side with the
      butchers against the victims, and Borys Derevyanko has been one of the casualties of
      your decision.
      Lubomyr Prytulak
      cc: Yaakov Bleich, Ed Bradley, Jeffrey Fager, Don Hewitt, Steve Kroft, Andy Rooney,
      Lesley Stahl, Mike Wallace, Simon Wiesenthal.
      Michaud refuses to apologize,
      Bouchard facing PQ split
      WebPosted Thu Dec 21 08:51:59 2000
      QUEBEC CITY - A controversy within the Parti
      Quйbйcois has escalated and could threaten the
      leadership of Premier Lucien Bouchard.
      It began last week when an influential member of
      the PQ, who wants to run in a byelection, made
      comments about the Holocaust.
      Bouchard demanded the comments be withdrawn.
      Yves Michaud refused.
      Now people within the PQ are taking sides.
      On Wednesday, as the
      National Assembly was
      wrapping up for the
      Christmas break, the
      controversy took a
      sharp turn for the worse.
      Michaud said he has no
      reason to apologize.
      "I have never said or written anything that
      minimizes the Nazi horror against the Jews," he
      said. "What you are doing to demonize a member
      of your party is a dishonour and not worthy of a
      premier."
      "Michaud said he was fed up with Jews always
      saying they're the only people to have suffered, and
      I won't have it," said Bouchard.
      Michaud has been around the PQ a long time. He
      is a committed, hardcore sovereigntist, part of a
      faction in the party that's often doubted Bouchard's
      commitment.
      Last week, on radio, and at a commission studying
      the French language, he said Quebec's Jews were
      intolerant, voting as they do en masse against
      sovereignty, and they believe they're the only
      people to have suffered throughout history.
      Michaud wants to be a PQ candidate in an
      upcoming byelection, but Bouchard's answer came
      Tuesday after a meeting with his caucus. Withdraw
      either your remarks, or your candidacy.
      Michaud will do neither. And now, he's gathering
      powerful support.
      He has the backing of Bouchard's predecessor,
      Jacques Parizeau, and some influential
      sovereigntist groups. They say his remarks were
      inelegant, inopportune, but not anti-Semitic.
      Bouchard in the meantime says the sovereignty
      movement must show the world it will not tolerate
      Michaud's opinions. He has the backing of his
      caucus, but in some cases, it sounds almost
      reluctant.
      Now, an emerging question: Can a split become
      an irrevocable rupture costing Bouchard the
      leadership?
      He asked his party to think about it over the
      holidays. But there's no apparent solution.
      In February, the party must choose its byelection
      candidate and right now, both sides seem locked
      into their positions facing a deadline they cannot
      avoid.
      POSTED AT 4:04 AM EST Wednesday, December 20
      Bouchard courts confrontation
      By RHЙAL SЙGUIN
      Globe and Mail Update
      Quebec - Premier Lucien Bouchard is prepared to
      put his leadership on the line if the Parti Quйbйcois fails to support him on several
      contentious issues, including his intention to ban a prominent PQ member from running in
      a by-election next spring.
      "He is prepared to take on the party," said a senior party member. "We get the sense that if
      the party executive goes against him on the Yves Michaud affair, on language or on his
      strategy for achieving sovereignty, the party will shatter. The mood is such that we may be
      looking at a confrontation between the leader and the party. He warned us it could be
      fatal."
      The source said this means that Mr. Bouchard could resign.
      Shareholder-rights activist and party member Yves Michaud, who had hoped to stand for
      the PQ in a by-election next spring, caused a furor earlier this month with his comments
      about Jews and ethnic voters.
      The party executive will meet in the new year to hear Mr. Michaud defend himself and
      decide whether to bar his candidacy. It will be the first in a number of showdowns within
      the party.
      In February, it must take a position on toughening the province's language laws and define
      a strategy to achieve sovereignty. Mr. Bouchard has made it known that he will not tolerate
      any radical position on language, and has warned members to be patient about another
      referendum.
      He has also said he favours blocking Mr. Michaud's candidacy.
      The Premier will have to deal with the mounting frustrations or face a confrontation.
      The split within sovereigntist ranks blew up in public this week as prominent separatist
      leaders, including former premier Jacques Parizeau and Bloc Quйbйcois Leader Gilles
      Duceppe, said Mr. Bouchard's PQ caucus had no right to support a motion in the National
      Assembly reprimanding Mr. Michaud.
      "The Parti Quйbйcois is divided in the same way Quebec society is divided," party
      vice-president Marie Malavoy said Tuesday. "The party didn't close the door on his
      candidacy ... but we have to discuss it as soon as possible."
      Mr. Michaud outraged the Jewish community for stating that Jews were not the only ones
      in the history of humanity to suffer. He also said there is an anti-sovereignty ethnic vote,
      pointing to 12 polls in the Montreal suburb of Cфte-Saint-Luc, which has a high
      concentration of Jewish residents, where everyone voted against sovereignty in the 1995
      referendum. He also called the B'nai Brith, an influential Jewish-rights organization,
      extremist and anti-sovereigntist.
      Mr. Duceppe said Tuesday that he disagreed with Mr. Michaud's comments, but that the
      National Assembly had no business condemning him for them. "It could be very
      hazardous, if not dangerous, for the National Assembly to hand out blame like that," he
      said. "It is one thing to ask a member of the National Assembly to apologize or withdraw
      what he said, like we do in Ottawa. But when it's not a member of that assembly, I think
      there are tribunals that can judge whether it was correct or not."
      In a full-page letter in Le Devoir Tuesday, 30 prominent sovereigntists, including Mr.
      Parizeau, accused the National Assembly of attempting to gag Mr. Michaud and denying
      him his right to freedom of speech.
      "We the undersigned, consider there is a real misuse of the role of the National Assembly,
      a serious attack on the rights and freedoms of citizens and a violation of the Charter," they
      wrote in French. It is "a flagrant act of injustice and a stunning show of arbitrary authority of
      which every citizen can from now on fear of becoming the victim."
      In interviews Monday, Mr. Parizeau compared Mr. Bouchard's defence of the National
      Assembly's position to the type of authoritarian actions taken in the era of premier Maurice
      Duplessis. "When I was young the Duplessis regime was in place. And a system that
      demands that you either believe or die with pressures to adopt this or that, you can be sure
      that I can see a throwback to that era. And that is why I protest," he said. "What Mr. Michaud
      said was clumsy, especially from someone who wants to be a candidate. But there is
      nothing in what he said to make a fuss about."
      At least two PQ caucus members, Diane Barbeau and Jean-Claude St-Andrй, have
      expressed regret about supporting the motion in the National Assembly.
      However, cabinet ministers and most caucus members refused to comment. Mr. Bouchard
      staunchly defended the National Assembly's reprimand Tuesday.
      "My view is that he [Mr. Michaud] should not be a candidate for the Parti Quйbйcois," Mr.
      Bouchard said after a caucus meeting. "If he withdraws [his remarks], it will clear the air
      and we could take a second look at it."
      He condemned Mr. Michaud's comparison of the suffering of Jews and the plight of
      Quebec sovereigntists. "When we know how an entire people was treated, how they were
      treated worse than cattle, people who were separated from their families, their children
      taken from them, jammed into trains and transported like garbage to concentration camps
      where after incredible suffering they were thrown into gas chambers and the ovens, we
      cannot speak lightly of these matters," he said.
      Although Mr. Michaud said he did not mean to make light of the Holocaust, Mr. Bouchard
      said perception was created.
      He also criticized Mr. Michaud for "resurrecting the spectre of the ethnic vote", in effect
      denouncing remarks made by Mr. Parizeau on the night of the 1995 referendum. Mr.
      Parizeau blamed "money and the ethnic vote" for that loss.
      "I am convinced this is an attack against people who don't deserve to be treated this way,"
      Mr. Bouchard said.
      ===================
      пыsпыsп
      ===================
      "Someone who has provoked the Jewish community for years
      should expect this sort of thing [a vicious, near-fatal beating]."
      - Nazi-hunter Serge Klarsfeld on the savage attack against Professor Faurisson
      Questioned Holocaust, historian badly beaten Toronto Globe and Mail | Monday,
      Sept. 18, 1989, p. A5
      Reuter
      CLERMONT-FERRAND, France
      A leading French revisionist historian who denies that millions of Jews were killed in the Holocaust was recovering from surgery
      yesterday after a savage beating.
      Robert Faurisson, 60, suffered a broken jaw and ribs and severe head injuries in the attack by three youths while he was walking his
      dog in the town of Vichy.
      A hospital spokesman in Clermont-Ferrand, the central French city where he was transferred for surgery, said Mr. Faurisson's condition
      was stable.
      "He was conscious, but he couldn't speak," said a fire fighter who gave Mr. Faurisson first aid. "His jaw was smashed. They destroyed
      his face."
      A previously unknown group, The Sons of the Memory of the Jews, took responsibility for the attack, saying those who deny the
      Holocaust should "beware."
      Veteran Nazi-hunters Serge and Beate Klarsfeld said they were not surprised by the attack. "Someone who has provoked the Jewish
      community for years should expect this sort of thing [a vicious, near-fatal beating]," Serge Klarsfeld said.
      This page is dedicated to the hundreds of people who have put their lives, reputation and freedom on the line to bring truth to the world.
      Dr. Fredrick Toben - latest
      victim!
      Though German in origin, Dr. Fredrick Toben was raised in Australia as an Australian citizen, and speaks both English and German. Becoming interested in exonerating the German
      people from the anti-German racism of the Holocaust legend, he at first edited a revisionist journal called Truth Missions, which was later renamed Adelaide Institute Newsletter. He then broadened out to establish Australia's revisionist website, Adelaide Institute. He has personally visited the site of Auschwitz and burrowed under the ruins of the alleged gas chamber, being unable to find the four holes in the roof which were supposedly used to throw in gas pellets. He conducted regular dialogue with Exterminationists, and did not expect to be arrested when he visited Prosecutor Klein in Mannheim, Germany, for a private discussion on the Holocaust laws in Germany, which make it mandatory to accept the entire Holocaust story.
      Nevertheless, he was arrested by Klein and police chief Mohr in Mannheim, Germany, in April, 1999, and is currently in Mannheim Prison awaiting trial for being a "holocaust denier".
      His trial is to start November 8, 1999, and he may face up to five years in prison if found guilty!
      Paul Rassinier
      Barred from entering Germany for trying to give testimony for the defense in political trials.
      Background and contribution:
      Born in 1906, Rassinier, a school teacher, is seen as the Father of modern European Revisionism. A French resistance fighter and friend of the Jews, he was imprisoned by the Germans for his illegal activities in Buchenwald and Camp Dora where he worked in the underground rocket factories. He was elected after the war as a member of the French National Assembly for the Socialist Party. Rassinier nonetheless wrote groundbreaking Revisionist books.
      Dr. Robert Faurisson
      At least 10 times physically assaulted by Holocaust Enforcers; on several occasions nearly killed. Jaws
      broken. Teeth knocked out. Hospitalized for weeks. Persecuted mercilessly in endless legal battles.
      Background and contribution:
      Known as the "Dean of the world-wide Revisionist movement" and principal teacher of Ernst Zьndel, Dr.
      Faurisson first discovered the technical and architectural drawings of the Auschwitz morgues, the
      crematories and other installations. He was also the first to insist that only a U.S. gas chamber expert
      could unravel the technical impossibility of the Auschwitz homicidal gassing story - as falsely told to the
      public for over half a century. Zьndel mentor, advisor and trial witness in the 1984 preliminary hearings
      and in the 1985 and 1988 Great Holocaust Trials. Slated as expert witness for the 1991 Munich trial of Ernst Zьndel. (The prosecution dropped the Anne Frank Diary part of the charge in mid-trial after they learned that Dr. Faurisson was going to testify to that point.)
      Thies Christophersen
      Forced to flee from country to country. Hounded to death after numerous acid attacks, arson, and attempts on his life and property.
      Background and contribution:
      As a German agrarian expert, Christophersen was stationed at Auschwitz in the critical period 1943-44. As a German expert, he had access to the entire camp. He took valuable
      photographs at the time. He was the first Revisionist eyewitness to come forward stating categorically that there were no gas chambers for killing humans in Auschwitz. He wrote the famous booklet, "Die Auschwitz-Lьge", (The Auschwitz Lie) translated into many languages. Zьndel witness in the 1985 and 1988 Great Holocaust Trials.
      Judge Wilhelm Stдglich
      Was tried and convicted in post-war German courts. Had his doctorate stripped from him and his pension cut for speaking out.
      Background and contribution:
      Judge Stдglich, stationed during WWII in the Auschwitz area with an anti-aircraft unit, published a
      groundbreaking book "Der Auschwitz Mythos" (The Auschwitz Myth) seized, forbidden and destroyed by
      West German court order.
      Joseph Burg (Ginzburg)
      Persecuted and beaten by Holocaust Enforcers of Jewish Defense League type thugs. Denied burial in the Munich Jewish cemetery. (Ernst Zьndel and Otto Ernst Remer gave the eulogies.)
      Background and contribution:
      Author of many books ("Schuld und Schicksal", "Zionazi", "Das Tagebuch der Anne Frank", "Auschwitz in alle Ewigkeit" etc.) as well as many pamphlets and two documentary interviews with Ernst Zьndel. Chief Jewish advisor, mentor and Zьndel witness in the 1988 Great Holocaust Trial.
      Professor Arthur Butz
      Vilified and persecuted for almost three decades.
      Background and contribution:
      An American electrical engineer and university professor, Butz wrote the "Bible" of modern
      Revisionism titled "The Hoax of the 20th Century". This book, which deals with most details
      of Holocaust lore from "shrunken heads" to "Jewish soap" and "gassing" claims, more
      than any other influenced Ernst Zundel in his Revisionist research.
      Haviv Schieber
      Driven to attempted suicide
      Background and contribution:
      A Polish Jew and former mayor of Ber Sheeba in Israel, Schieber taught Ernst
      Zьndel much about Israeli reality. He was an Israeli Revisionist, wanting to revise
      Israel's attitudes, institutions and borders. He fled Israel to find safety in the USA,
      was denied political asylum at first, and tried to take his life by slashing his wrists at Washington, D.C. airport on the day of his
      deportation. He was finally allowed refuge from Israeli persecution in the US in the early 1970s.
      Francois Duprat
      Killed for distributing the French language version of "Did Six Million Really Die?"
      Background and contribution:
      A French writer, historian and educator, Duprat had introduced the booklet "Did Six Million Really
      Die?" in France by publishing the first French translation. He also published "The Mystery of the Gas Chamber." He was only
      38 years old when his car was blown up by a bomb and he was assassinated on March 18, 1978. His wife, who was with him in
      the car, lost the use of her legs in this terrorist act. Two Jewish groups took credit for the assassination - the "Jewish
      Remembrance Commando" and another group who identified itself as ". . . Jewish Revolutionary Group." The assassins were
      never found.
      Ditlieb Felderer
      Charged, tried, convicted and jailed in Sweden. Vilified in the press. Forced to live in exile.
      Background and contribution:
      Felderer, at one time a prominent Jehovah's Witness, is known as an early researcher into the physical
      evidence in every major concentration camp in then Communist Eastern Europe. Felderer took over 30,000
      photographs of every conceivable detail in the camps. He discovered that there was a swimming pool for the
      inmates in Auschwitz, modern hospital facilities, including a gynecological section, as well as an orchestra, live theatre,
      well-stocked library, and sculpting classes. He discovered the musical score of the "Auschwitz Waltz" in the secret archives
      accessible only with special permission. He found that an intimate role was played by Jehovah Witnesses in the camps, who
      cooperated with the SS-Administration, and he exposed the lie of the 60,000 Jehovah's Witnesses killed. (On his initiative and
      insistence, the inflated number was reduced to 203) [Trial Transcript Vol. 18, 4226 to 4229; 4645]. For his Revisionist work,
      Felderer was excommunicated - that is, drummed out of the Jehovah Witnesses' sect. He has been persecuted by the
      Holocaust Enforcers ever since. Felderer is known for his weird sense of humor and outlandish, offensive cartoons. He
      believes that deliberate Holocaust liars and history falsifiers should not have their sensibilities spared. This idiosyncrasy of
      Felderers is being exploited by Holocaust propagandists in counter-attacks against him. Zьndel advisor and witness in the
      1985 and 1988 Great Holocaust Trials.
      Professor Austin App
      Persecuted for his courageous and tireless truth campaign for two generations on behalf of
      German-Americans.
      Background and contribution:
      A German-American community leader and author of many booklets and tracts - among them "The Six
      Million Swindle," "Action on a War Crime," "The Bombing Atrocity of Dresden," "Ravaging the women of
      Conquered Europe," and many others - Professor App was an early guide of Ernst Zьndel.
      Ernst Zьndel
      Three documented assassination attempts by fire and pipe bombs. Endless legal
      harassment leading to repeated jailings and bankrupting of his graphic arts
      business.
      Background and contribution:
      Nicknamed the "Revisionist Dynamo" or the "Revisionist Renaissance Man" for his
      untiring Revisionist Truth Campaign and his comprehensive grasp of complex political issues, Zьndel - more than any other
      Revisionist on earth - caused the Holocaust Hoax to become a mainstream topic of discussion. Extensive chronological
      biography on the Zundelsite.
      Jim Keegstra
      Lost his job and his reputation was destroyed. Prevented an arson attempt against him. Was convicted to a
      $3,000 fine after 10 years of costly litigation. Was financially ruined by his ordeal.
      Background and contribution:
      A Canadian school teacher of Dutch background, Keegstra taught both sides of the Holocaust and other
      questions of history. He was charged under Canada's infamous "Hate Laws", and was tried and convicted. He
      appealed - and was re-tried and re-convicted. Three times, his case went to the Supreme Court. He ultimately lost. Zьndel
      witness in the 1985 Great Holocaust Trial.
      Frank Walus
      Attacked seven times by Jewish assailants; nearly killed in an acid attack. Lost his US
      citizenship and his home to pay for his defense.
      Background and contribution:
      A Polish German-American auto worker, Walus was targeted and accused falsely by
      Simon Wiesenthal to be a "Nazi War Criminal." Vilified by the US media in a vicious
      campaign as the "Butcher of Kielce", Walus fought bravely against his tormentors of the Office of Special Investigations, also
      known as the US "Nazi Hunters". He ultimately won his case against them in a costly appeals process but died after several
      massive heart attacks - a bitter, financially ruined man. He refused to be buried on US soil because he felt the country had
      betrayed and failed him. Zьndel witness in the 1985 Great Holocaust Trial.
      Emil Lachout
      Mercilessly hounded by Austrian authorities and the Austrian lapdog media for over a decade. Forced to
      undergo a humiliating psychiatric assessment.
      Background and contribution:
      An Austrian school teacher, former military police man and Boy Scout leader, Lachout's name is associated
      with the famous Mьller-Lachout document. He ultimately won his case in the European Court of Human
      Rights. Austria must pay him compensation but hasn't done yet - so far. Never a man to do things by halves, Lachout is
      demanding an apology from the Austrian State. Zьndel witness in the 1988 Great Holocaust Trial.
      Henri Roques
      Had his doctorate revoked.
      Background and contribution:
      Henri Rocques is a French author and researcher who exposed the Myth of Pope Pius XII's complicity in
      the Holocaust. His doctoral thesis made world-wide headlines in 1986 when, for the first time in the nearly eight-century history
      of French universities, a duly awarded doctorate was quickly revoked on French government's orders, after an outry by the
      Leftist-Jewish media in France. In a tightly argued dissertation, Rocques came to the stunning conclusion that the allegations
      of mass gassings of Jews made by SS officer Kurt Gerstein were groundless, and that the supposed Roman-Catholic coverup
      of this "slaughter" are false. He further concluded that postwar academics deliberately falsified key parts of the already
      tortured Gerstein testimony. His dissertation was eventually published by the Institute for Historical Review in book form
      under the title "The Confessions of Kurt Gerstein."
      Tjiudar Rudolph
      Imprisoned in Germany for lengthy stints for "doubting the Holocaust", even though he was in his
      mid-eighties at the time.
      Background and contribution:
      A former German Security Service member, fluent in five languages including Yiddish and Polish, Rudolph
      was involved with organizing Red Cross inspection tours of Auschwitz and other camps during the war.
      He wrote numerous Revisionist articles. He accompanied Fred Leuchter as translator to Auschwitz and Maidanek in 1988. He
      was charged and convicted for publishing a newsletter disputing the "Six Million" story. Zьndel witness in the 1985 and 1988
      Great Holocaust Trials.
      Udo Walendy
      Convicted and imprisoned in Germany for 15 months, even though already in his seventies and in
      poor health with a serious heart condition.
      Background and contribution:
      A prolific German researcher, writer and publisher of numerous books and a series of popular
      booklets called "Historische Tatsachen"- ("Historical Truths") including the German version of "Did
      Six Million Really Die?" and the German language version of the Leuchter Report #1 - Walendy was dragged before the courts
      numerous times. His home and offices were frequently raided by the police. Business files, books, printing plates and
      computers were confiscated. Zьndel advisor and witness in the 1985 and 1988 Great Holocaust Trials.
      Fred Leuchter
      Arrested and jailed in Germany. Financially ruined.
      Background and contribution:
      An American execution expert, Leuchter designed and maintained gas chambers for several US penal
      institutions. He was sent by Ernst Zьndel to investigate Auschwitz, Majdanek, Dachau, Hartheim and
      other alleged "Nazi Death Camps" and "gassing facilities." Author of the devastating series of Leuchter
      Reports. (I, II, III, IV) and many articles and videotaped presentations that resulted from these investigations, Leuchter was
      blacklisted in the US and hounded by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby and the world's lapdog media. He was arrested and
      jailed in Germany for giving an anti-Holocaust lecture for Gьnther Deckert, a well-known political party leader. Allowed out on
      bail, Leuchter returned to the US. and chose not to go back to Germany to stand trial. Nonetheless, he lost his livelihood as a
      result. Sensational Zьndel witness in the Great Holocaust Trial in 1988. Leuchter, although present in the courtroom in Munich,
      was not allowed to testify about his research findings in Auschwitz for Ernst Zьndel in the German (Munich) Trial in 1991.
      David Irving
      Convicted, jailed, fined, deported and barred from numerous countries and hounded world-wide by
      Holocaust Enforcers.
      Background and contribution:
      A prolific British author of approximately 36 books and recognized authority on Hitler and World War II,
      Irving pretty much believed and accepted the standard Holocaust version - until he read the Leuchter
      Report. He agreed to testify as the last witness for the defense in the 1988 Zьndel Trial. His appearance was a sensation! In the
      following years, he went on widely publicized and acclaimed Canada- and America-wide lecture tours. He traveled as a
      speaker through several European countries, with headlines and controversy dogging his every step. He drew packed houses
      and infuriated the Holocaust Lobby, which reacted with vicious smear campaigns and managed to have Irving arrested and
      convicted in Munich, Germany, for "defaming the dead." This conviction caused Irving to be ultimately banned from Canada,
      Australia, Italy, New Zealand and South Africa. He was deported in handcuffs from Niagara Falls, Ontario, after a farcical
      Immigration hearing, during which he was held and treated in jail like some common criminal - for weeks! He has been
      hounded by the Holocaust Enforcers ever since. A combative man, Irving has lately gone on counter-attacks and is suing the
      British Board of Jewish Deputies and American Jewish Holocaust Promoter, Deborah Lipstadt and her publishers. Zьndel
      witness in the 1988 Great Holocaust Trial.
      Ivan Lagace
      Became the target of several Royal Canadian Mounted Police raids. Resigned from his job as crematory
      director after receiving endless threats by anonymous callers and from thugs claiming to be the Jewish
      Defense League.
      Background and contribution:
      A crematory expert from Calgary, Alberta, who had been responsible for the disposing of 10,000 bodies in
      his career, Lagace finally sorted out - publicly and in open court all the fanciful lies about the Germans supposedly
      "cremating multiple corpses in single corpse retorts" in Auschwitz, Birkenau and elsewhere. Lagace's testimony put an end to