Современная электронная библиотека ModernLib.Net

Monet

Автор: Nathalia Brodskaya
Жанр:
Серия: Perfect Square
Аннотация:

For Claude Monet the designation ‘impressionist’ always remained a source of pride. In spite of all the things critics have written about his work, Monet continued to be a true impressionist to the end of his very long life. He was so by deep conviction, and for his Impressionism he may have sacrificed many other opportunities that his enormous talent held out to him. Monet did not paint classical compositions with figures, and he did not become a portraitist, although his professional training included those skills. He chose a single genre for himself, landscape painting, and in that he achieved a degree of perfection none of his contemporaries managed to attain. Yet the little boy began by drawing caricatures. Boudin advised Monet to stop doing caricatures and to take up landscapes instead. The sea, the sky, animals, people, and trees are beautiful in the exact state in which nature created them – surrounded by air and light. Indeed, it was Boudin who passed on to Monet his conviction of the importance of working in the open air, which Monet would in turn transmit to his impressionist friends. Monet did not want to enrol at the Ecole des Beaux-Arts. He chose to attend a private school, L’Acad?mie Suisse, established by an ex-model on the Quai d’Orf?vres near the Pont Saint-Michel. One could draw and paint from a live model there for a modest fee. This was where Monet met the future impressionist Camille Pissarro. Later in Gleyre’s studio, Monet met Auguste Renoir Alfred Sisley, and Fr?d?ric Bazille. Monet considered it very important that Boudin be introduced to his new friends. He also told his friends of another painter he had found in Normandy. This was the remarkable Dutchman Jongkind. His landscapes were saturated with colour, and their sincerity, at times even their na?vet?, was combined with subtle observation of the Normandy shore’s variable nature. At this time Monet’s landscapes were not yet characterized by great richness of colour. Rather, they recalled the tonalities of paintings by the Barbizon artists, and Boudin’s seascapes. He composed a range of colour based on yellow-brown or blue-grey. At the Third Impressionist Exhibition in 1877 Monet presented a series of paintings for the first time: seven views of the Saint-Lazare train station. He selected them from among twelve he had painted at the station. This motif in Monet’s work is in line not only with Manet’s Chemin de fer (The Railway) and with his own landscapes featuring trains and stations at Argenteuil, but also with a trend that surfaced after the railways first began to appear. In 1883, Monet had bought a house in the village of Giverny, near the little town of Vernon. At Giverny, series painting became one of his chief working procedures. Meadows became his permanent workplace. When a journalist, who had come from V?theuil to interview Monet, asked him where his studio was, the painter answered, “My studio! I’ve never had a studio, and I can’t see why one would lock oneself up in a room. To draw, yes – to paint, no”. Then, broadly gesturing towards the Seine, the hills, and the silhouette of the little town, he declared, “There’s my real studio.”Monet began to go to London in the last decade of the nineteenth century. He began all his London paintings working directly from nature, but completed many of them afterwards, at Giverny. The series formed an indivisible whole, and the painter had to work on all his canvases at one time. A friend of Monet’s, the writer Octave Mirbeau, wrote that he had accomplished a miracle. With the help of colours he had succeeded in recreating on the canvas something almost impossible to capture: he was reproducing sunlight, enriching it with an infinite number of reflections. Alone among the impressionists, Claude Monet took an almost scientific study of the possibilities of colour to its limits; it is unlikely that one could have gone any further in that direction.

     

     

     



    Извините, данная книга недоступна в связи с жалобой правообладателя.
    Вы можете прочитать ознакомительный фрагмент книги.

 

 

Ваш комментарий:

 
 

Случайные комментарии

Cyber14 комментирует книгу «Желтые небеса» (Орлов Антон):

Честно говоря,ожидал большего от "продолжения" Антираспада,Мартин Паад в той книге показался куда более сообразительным и интересным,а здесь автор не удосужился хоть как-то раскрыть его образ,наоборот,загнал его в жесткие стероетипные рамки.. Сюжет,в целом-неплох,но здесь вы не найдете того остроумного и неожиданного юмора,как в Антираспаде,а развязка,в общем,оставляет желать лучшего..Ни по эффектности,ни по логической завершенности.. Впрочем,можно поставить четверочку.. ****

taas комментирует книгу «Правда в три короба» (Донцова Дарья):

хозяйственная хорошо-жадная ужас если книгу нельзя скачать или прочитать уберите автора из библиотеки

Серега комментирует книгу «Трое из Леса» (Никитин Юрий Александрович):

книга ваще нармальная,читал даже дух захватывало

Камилла комментирует книгу «С того берега» (Александр Иванович Герцен):

Нужна книга «с того берега»

Диана комментирует книгу «Дженни Герхардт» (Драйзер Теодор):

Обожаю Драйзера, замечательный писатель! Мое знакомство с ним началось с этой книги, мне тоже очень понравилась! После прочитала "Сестру Керри", тоже очень хорошая книга, очень нравится, как он раскрывает внутренний мир своих героев.

izvr-100 комментирует книгу «Атака Боло» (Кейт Уильям):

серия Боло довольно интересно,но огромное количество грамматических ошибок

егор данилюк комментирует книгу «Стань диким!» (Хантер Эрин):

самая классная книга.

данила комментирует книгу «Легенды и мифы Древней Греции» (Кун Николай Альбертович):

нам в 6 классе задали вспомнить что в 5 задали а мы это читали

Критикующий комментирует книгу «Опустошение» (Егор Роге):

Просто море пространства для критики. Начнем с того что, вся история чистый вымысел - слишком уж очевидны типажи героев. Но при этом не лубок. Видно что автор знает материал, хотя вряд ли был участником событий. Кто такой кстати Егор Роге? Видно что местами написано очень профессионально. Может это группа авторов? Почему тогда нет других книг. Очень интересно написано, этого не отнять.


Информация для правообладателей